Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

The E-M1 II was announced 2 years later than the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II scores versus the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
E-M1 II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 32 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus E-M1 II
WG-4 GPS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
E-M1 II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II against the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-4 GPS is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 240 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $210 |