Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Revealed February 2014
  • Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 II was announced 2 years later than the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II scores versus the WG-4 GPS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 E-M1 II WG-4 GPS 
RevealedSeptember 2016February 2014More recent by 32 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kClearer screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WG-4 GPS E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 E-M1 II WG-4 GPS 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II against the WG-4 GPS.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-4 GPS is 68 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WG-4 GPS.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography advice
75
focusing manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
41
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
78
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition (574 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (235g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography features
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
has phase detect auto focus
low battery (350 CIPA)
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
continuous shooting slow (2.0 frames/s)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography info
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather sealing
has touch focus
MP count good (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
low battery (350 per charge)
69
environment proof
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than competition in class (235 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography highlights
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
has double storage slots
low battery (350 per charge)
54
has manual focus
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery life (240 shots)
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging advice
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focus
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has mic port
lighter than competition (574 grams)
34
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (235g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Class Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Announced 2016-09-19 2014-02-05
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 235 gr (0.52 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 240 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots 2 Single
Retail pricing $1,700 $210