Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
68
Imaging
58
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Released September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was introduced 2 years after the WG-M1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M1 II scores versus the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh WG-M1

 E-M1 II WG-M1 
ReleasedSeptember 2016September 2014More modern by 25 months
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"1.5"Larger display (+1.5")
Display resolution1037k115kCrisper display (+922k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WG-M1 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-M1

 E-M1 II WG-M1 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II and the WG-M1.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-M1 is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-M1.

Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
74
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
29
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Ricoh WG-M1
77
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
includes focus by touch
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
52
weather proof
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
maximum ISO low (800)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography highlights
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
has phase detect autofocus
bad battery pack (350 shots)
37
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
weather proof
good battery (350 per charge)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
environment proof
includes focus by touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (350 shots)
64
good battery (350 CIPA)
weather proof
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography factors
75
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
2 card slots
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
35
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
weather proof
good battery (350 CIPA)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (1.5 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (800)
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse mode
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging features
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging features
78
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has external mic support
lighter than competition in class (574g)
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
does not have external microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-M1
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIRicoh WG-M1
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Ricoh WG-M1
Type Pro Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2016-09-19 2014-09-12
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 25600 800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - (1×)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 1.5"
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 115 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds -
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds -
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MOV, H.264 H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 350 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots microSD/microSDHC, internal
Card slots Dual One
Pricing at launch $1,700 $2,000