Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was introduced 2 years after the WG-M1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M1 II scores versus the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Ricoh WG-M1
| E-M1 II | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | September 2014 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 115k | Crisper display (+922k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| WG-M1 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-M1
| E-M1 II | WG-M1 |
|---|
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II and the WG-M1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WG-M1 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WG-M1.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2016-09-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | (1×) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | - |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 350 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $2,000 |