Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released September 2006
- New Model is Samsung GX-20
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung GX-10, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and GX-10 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was unveiled 10 years later than the GX-10 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II scores vs the GX-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Samsung GX-10. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung GX-10
| E-M1 II | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | September 2006 | More recent by 122 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 210k | Clearer screen (+827k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| GX-10 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung GX-10
| E-M1 II | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II vs the GX-10.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and GX-10 is 68 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and GX-10.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung GX-10 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2006-09-21 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 793g (1.75 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Two | One |
| Launch cost | $1,700 | $850 |