Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB550
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ15W, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ15W (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ15W (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was manufactured 7 years later than the HZ15W and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the HZ15W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Samsung HZ15W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ15W
E-M1 II | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2009 | Fresher by 93 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus E-M1 II
HZ15W | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ15W
E-M1 II | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ15W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II against the HZ15W.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and HZ15W is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and HZ15W.
Clearly, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ15W |
Other name | - | WB550 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 249g (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $330 |