Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ25W (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

The E-M1 II was introduced 6 years later than the HZ25W and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the HZ25W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Samsung HZ25W. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ25W
E-M1 II | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 76 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-M1 II
HZ25W | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ25W
E-M1 II | HZ25W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the HZ25W.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and HZ25W is 68 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and HZ25W.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ25W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ25W |
Also called as | - | WB5000 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 428g (0.94 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $350 |