Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Samsung HZ30W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung HZ30W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Also referred to as WB600
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ30W (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ30W (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was launched 6 years after the HZ30W which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ30W being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1 II grades vs the HZ30W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ30W

 E-M1 II HZ30W 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016January 2010More modern by 82 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus E-M1 II

 HZ30W E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ30W

 E-M1 II HZ30W 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Samsung HZ30W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II vs the HZ30W.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HZ30W is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and HZ30W.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ30W Portrait photography factors
75
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
29
you can focus manually
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Samsung HZ30W Street photography highlights
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
offers touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than competitors (574g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (245g)
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Samsung HZ30W
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
sensor has phase detect autofocus
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
42
great zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Samsung HZ30W
72
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
environment proof
offers touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
63
lighter than competitors (245g)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (360mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Samsung HZ30W Landscape photography highlights
76
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
two card slots
bad battery pack (350 CIPA)
43
you can focus manually
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Samsung HZ30W
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone socket
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
30
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ30W
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISamsung HZ30W
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Samsung HZ30W
Also called as - WB600
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2016-09-19 2010-01-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 245g (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Dual 1
Price at launch $1,700 $280