Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as WB600

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ30W (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ30W (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M1 II was launched 6 years after the HZ30W which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ30W being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M1 II grades vs the HZ30W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Samsung HZ30W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ30W
E-M1 II | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 82 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus E-M1 II
HZ30W | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ30W
E-M1 II | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Samsung HZ30W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II vs the HZ30W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HZ30W is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and HZ30W.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ30W |
Also called as | - | WB600 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2010-01-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $280 |