Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
34 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung HZ35W, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was launched 6 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-M1 II | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2016 | June 2010 | Fresher by 77 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 614k | Sharper screen (+423k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M1 II
| HZ35W | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ35W
| E-M1 II | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the HZ35W.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HZ35W is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and HZ35W.
All in all, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Two | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,700 | $300 |