Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
68
Imaging
58
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
34
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Announced June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung HZ35W, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was launched 6 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1 II HZ35W 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016June 2010Fresher by 77 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k614kSharper screen (+423k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M1 II

 HZ35W E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ35W

 E-M1 II HZ35W 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II vs the HZ35W.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HZ35W is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specs. The photograph here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and HZ35W.

All in all, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will show greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography info
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography info
74
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
33
has manual focus
provides face detect focusing
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Samsung HZ35W
77
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
weather proofing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
good high ISO (25,600)
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (245g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography details
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography details
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
not so great battery power (350 shots)
42
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking focus
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography info
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography info
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
weather proofing
offers focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
63
lighter than competition in class (245g)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (360mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography features
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography features
75
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery power (350 shots)
42
has manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging advice
78
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes microphone jack
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
31
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (245g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISamsung HZ35W
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Samsung HZ35W
Also referred to as - WB650
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2016-09-19 2010-06-16
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 5.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lbs) 245 gr (0.54 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Two 1
Launch cost $1,700 $300