Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
93 Imaging
51 Features
68 Overall
57
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20.5MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX-M Mount
- 196g - 110 x 62 x 23mm
- Released March 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the NX mini (20.5MP) is very well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NX mini (1") use totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was launched 2 years after the NX mini which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX mini being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II scores versus the NX mini with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Samsung NX mini. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Samsung NX mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung NX mini
| E-M1 II | NX mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | March 2014 | More modern by 31 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 461k | Crisper display (+576k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX mini over the Olympus E-M1 II
| NX mini | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung NX mini
| E-M1 II | NX mini | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX mini has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 196 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the NX mini.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and NX mini is 68 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The picture below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and NX mini.
To sum up, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung NX mini will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 0.5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX mini Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung NX mini | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung NX mini |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2014-03-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20.5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 160 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX-M |
| Total lenses | 107 | 2 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT-LCD (180 degree tilt) |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Smart Flash, auto, auto + redeye reduction, fill-in, fill-in + redeye reduction, 1st curtain, 2nd curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/200 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 (all 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 196 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 62 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 650 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | B740 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Retail cost | $1,700 | $530 |