Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


80 Imaging
55 Features
50 Overall
53
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Revealed December 2010
- Replaced the Samsung NX10
- Refreshed by Samsung NX20

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and NX11 (15MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NX11 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.

The E-M1 II was brought out 5 years after the NX11 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II grades against the NX11 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Samsung NX11. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung NX11
E-M1 II | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | December 2010 | More modern by 70 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper screen (+423k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Olympus E-M1 II
NX11 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung NX11
E-M1 II | NX11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX11 has specifications of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") and a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II against the NX11.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and NX11 is 68 and 80 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and NX11.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve more detail having its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung NX11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung NX11 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | DRIM Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 11.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 499g (1.10 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 553 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 400 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $626 |