Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX1100
- New Model is Samsung NX3000

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung NX2000, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is fairly comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

The E-M1 II was released 2 years later than the NX2000 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II grades versus the NX2000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Samsung NX2000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung NX2000
E-M1 II | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 35 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-M1 II
NX2000 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Display resolution | 1152k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung NX2000
E-M1 II | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Samsung NX2000 has measurements of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the NX2000.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and NX2000 is 68 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and NX2000.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same MP but not the same sensor sizing. The E-M1 II has the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult. The more recent E-M1 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung NX2000 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 228g (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 340 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $599 |