Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Released January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung WB850F, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and WB850F (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WB850F (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was introduced 4 years later than the WB850F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-M1 II grades versus the WB850F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Samsung WB850F. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Samsung WB850F
| E-M1 II | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | January 2012 | Fresher by 58 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 614k | Crisper screen (+423k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Olympus E-M1 II
| WB850F | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung WB850F
| E-M1 II | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung WB850F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II against the WB850F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and WB850F is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WB850F.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Samsung WB850F |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $599 |