Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
68
Imaging
58
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
61
Features
38
Overall
51

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 II was unveiled 2 years after the DP2 Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-M1 II DP2 Quattro 
LaunchedSeptember 2016February 2014Newer by 32 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kSharper screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-M1 II

 DP2 Quattro E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-M1 II DP2 Quattro 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and DP2 Quattro is 68 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The picture below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and DP2 Quattro.

To sum up, both of the cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II comes with the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF trickier. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography features
74
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW formats
76
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography advice
77
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
offers touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
great high ISO (25,600)
60
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
low battery power (350 shots)
47
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
weather sealing
offers touch focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
low battery power (350 shots)
53
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
75
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
2 card slots
low battery power (350 CIPA)
59
focusing manually
screen size is decent (3")
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging advice
78
selfie friendly display
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic support
lighter than competition in class (574g)
9
can't record video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Pro Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Released 2016-09-19 2014-02-13
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII TRUE III engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Max video resolution 4096x2160 None
Video format MOV, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lb) 395 gr (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots -
Storage slots Two One
Price at release $1,700 $931