Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
68 Imaging
58 Features
93 Overall
72
70 Imaging
61 Features
38 Overall
51
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was unveiled 2 years after the DP2 Quattro which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the DP2 Quattro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| E-M1 II | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2016 | February 2014 | Newer by 32 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-M1 II
| DP2 Quattro | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| E-M1 II | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and DP2 Quattro is 68 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The picture below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and DP2 Quattro.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II comes with the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF trickier. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-09-19 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 45mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
| Video format | MOV, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 395 gr (0.87 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
| Storage slots | Two | One |
| Price at release | $1,700 | $931 |