Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Announced February 2011
- Previous Model is Sigma DP2s

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma DP2x, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and DP2x (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.

The E-M1 II was released 5 years after the DP2x which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II grades against the DP2x when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sigma DP2x. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sigma DP2x
E-M1 II | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 69 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Olympus E-M1 II
DP2x | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma DP2x
E-M1 II | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2x has measurements of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") along with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma DP2x in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II versus the DP2x.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and DP2x is 68 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The image here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and DP2x.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail as a result of its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma DP2x |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 41mm (1x) |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 320x240 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 280 grams (0.62 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $699 |