Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced July 2019
- Later Model is Sigma fp L

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma fp, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the fp (25MP) is very comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and fp (Full frame) possess different sensor dimensions.

The E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years earlier than the fp and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M1 II grades vs the fp in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sigma fp. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sigma fp
E-M1 II | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Olympus E-M1 II
fp | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2019 | ![]() | September 2016 | More recent by 34 months |
Display sizing | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+1063k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma fp
E-M1 II | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sigma fp has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sigma fp in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II against the fp.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and fp is 68 and 84 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and fp.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sigma fp will produce extra detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-M1 II will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sigma fp Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sigma fp |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2019-07-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Leica L |
Total lenses | 107 | 30 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.2" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 2,100k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 422 gr (0.93 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $2,050 |