Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Launched September 2016
- Older Model is Sony A99
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A99 II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A99 II (Full frame) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was introduced very close to the A99 II so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M1 II scores versus the A99 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha A99 II. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A99 II
E-M1 II | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus E-M1 II
A99 II | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1229k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A99 II
E-M1 II | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | September 2016 | Similar generation | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A99 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A99 II.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A99 II is 68 and 57 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and A99 II.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A99 II will deliver extra detail using its extra 22 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 399 |
Cross type focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 849 grams (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 490 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $3,198 |