Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
64 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 638g - 133 x 95 x 71mm
- Released July 2006
- Superseded the Konica Minolta 5D
- Replacement is Sony A550
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A100, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A100 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A100 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was brought out 10 years later than the A100 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A100 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II matches up against the A100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A100. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A100
E-M1 II | A100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | July 2006 | Fresher by 124 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A100 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A100 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A100
E-M1 II | A100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II offers outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A100 has sizing of 133mm x 95mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") having a weight of 638 grams (1.41 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A100 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II vs the A100.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A100 is 68 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and A100.
Clearly, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2006-07-31 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 638 gr (1.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 133 x 95 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 61 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 11.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 476 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FM55H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $1,000 |