Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Launched July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200 Overview
Here is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A200, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was announced 8 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M1 II grades against the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A200
E-M1 II | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | July 2008 | Fresher by 100 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A200 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A200
E-M1 II | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II has outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A200 is 68 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The photograph here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and A200.
Plainly, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will render more detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 572 gr (1.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Price at release | $1,700 | $100 |