Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched January 2008
- Updated by Sony A330
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A300 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was released 8 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II grades versus the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A300
E-M1 II | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | January 2008 | Fresher by 106 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A300 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A300
E-M1 II | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II vs the A300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and A300 is 68 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A300.
All in all, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2008-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 632g (1.39 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $0 |