Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Launched January 2008
  • Updated by Sony A330
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Overview

Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A300 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was released 8 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II grades versus the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A300

 E-M1 II A300 
LaunchedSeptember 2016January 2008Fresher by 106 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A300 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A300

 E-M1 II A300 
Focus manually Very precise focusing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II has got external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A300 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II vs the A300.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and A300 is 68 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing only by going through specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A300.

All in all, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Sony A300 Portrait photography factors
76
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
59
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
resolution not great (10MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Sony A300 Street photography factors
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
weather proof
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
74
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony A300 as a Sports photography camera
75
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect autofocus
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect AF
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony A300
72
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
weather proof
offers focus by touch
good MP (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
low battery pack (350 per charge)
45
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
resolution not great (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Sony A300
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proof
has dual storage slots
low battery pack (350 per charge)
57
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging features
Sony A300 Vlogging features
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic jack
lighter than competitors (574g)
9
no video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A300
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2016-09-19 2008-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 None
Video format MOV, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 632g (1.39 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 64
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 11.4
DXO Low light score 1312 538
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Compact Flash
Storage slots Two One
Cost at launch $1,700 $0