Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A380
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A390, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A390 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was brought out 6 years later than the A390 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 II grades vs the A390 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A390
E-M1 II | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | July 2010 | More recent by 75 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A390 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A390
E-M1 II | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A390 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II versus the A390.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A390 is 68 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and A390.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 230 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $500 |