Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
64 Imaging
54 Features
78 Overall
63
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 599g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Released August 2010
- Old Model is Sony A500
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A560, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A560 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A560 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was revealed 6 years after the A560 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A560 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the A560 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha DSLR-A560. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony A560 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A560
E-M1 II | A560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | August 2010 | More modern by 74 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 922k | Sharper display (+115k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A560 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A560 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A560
E-M1 II | A560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II provides physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A560 has dimensions of 137mm x 104mm x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A560 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the A560.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and A560 is 68 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The image here may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A560.
Plainly, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II with its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A560 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A560 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2010-08-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 599 gr (1.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 817 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 1050 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $650 |