Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 GPS was announced 14 months after the WB250F which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung WB250F
WG-4 GPS | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 14 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
WB250F | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung WB250F
WG-4 GPS | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the WB250F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and WB250F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and WB250F.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 GPS is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung WB250F |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235g (0.52 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $210 | $250 |