Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0947/b0947af385e09995bd1e56c5e9e9356bb14ab574" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front"
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Launched October 2008
- Later Model is Sony A99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A900, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A900 (25MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A900 (Full frame) enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 II was introduced 8 years after the A900 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-M1 II matches up against the A900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A900
E-M1 II | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | October 2008 | More modern by 97 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A900 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A900
E-M1 II | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c88de/c88debc5686a0466bc209117bc7144dec18d65d4" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A900 is 68 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3185d/3185d5fbdf91fe92d6a31f90efac7a1aeeaef31e" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and A900.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A900 will offer extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7341/f734187ee3c8869c3bc77fcaae3d6563862ad5e3" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c34a0/c34a02b933f08578a0eba840ee931eee2d29d82e" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A900 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 25MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6048 x 4032 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 895 gr (1.97 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 880 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $2,736 |