Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched June 2010
- Updated by Sony NEX-C3
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and NEX-3 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NEX-3 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was released 6 years after the NEX-3 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the NEX-3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha NEX-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony NEX-3
E-M1 II | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | June 2010 | More modern by 77 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
NEX-3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-3
E-M1 II | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3 has sizing of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the NEX-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and NEX-3 is 68 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The pic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and NEX-3.
All in all, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-06-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lb) | 297 grams (0.65 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 68 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.0 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $0 |