Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched February 2013
- Replaced the Sony NEX-F3
- Newer Model is Sony a5000
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was manufactured 3 years after the NEX-3N which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the NEX-3N with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony NEX-3N
E-M1 II | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | February 2013 | Newer by 44 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-M1 II
NEX-3N | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-3N
E-M1 II | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II versus the NEX-3N.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and NEX-3N is 68 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing specifications. The pic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and NEX-3N.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will render greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 480 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $399 |