Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-5N
- New Model is Sony NEX-5T
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony NEX-5R, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NEX-5R (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was unveiled 4 years later than the NEX-5R and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II grades against the NEX-5R with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony NEX-5R
E-M1 II | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | August 2012 | More recent by 50 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus E-M1 II
NEX-5R | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-5R
E-M1 II | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II features external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony NEX-5R has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony NEX-5R in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the NEX-5R.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and NEX-5R is 68 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and NEX-5R.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $750 |