Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Replaced the Sony NEX-3
- Renewed by Sony NEX-F3
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-C3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) possess different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was announced 5 years after the NEX-C3 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the NEX-C3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony NEX-C3
E-M1 II | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | August 2011 | Newer by 62 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer display (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
NEX-C3 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-C3
E-M1 II | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II provides external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has proportions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-C3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the NEX-C3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and NEX-C3 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and NEX-C3.
All in all, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 pounds) | 225 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 400 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $343 |