Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Released August 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Later Model is Sony NEX-3N
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony NEX-F3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 II was announced 4 years later than the NEX-F3 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II grades versus the NEX-F3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony NEX-F3
| E-M1 II | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 |  | August 2012 | More recent by 50 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| NEX-F3 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony NEX-F3
| E-M1 II | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony NEX-F3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the NEX-F3.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and NEX-F3 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and NEX-F3.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2012-08-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 314 grams (0.69 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 470 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Two | One |
| Launch price | $1,700 | $470 |
