Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Alpha a6600 front
Portability
77
Imaging
70
Features
96
Overall
80

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A6600
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 503g - 120 x 67 x 69mm
  • Introduced August 2019
  • New Model is Sony A6700
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A6600, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A6600 (24MP) is very comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A6600 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years prior to the A6600 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6600 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the A6600 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A6600

 E-M1 II A6600 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k922kCrisper display (+115k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A6600 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A6600 E-M1 II 
IntroducedAugust 2019September 2016Newer by 35 months

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6600

 E-M1 II A6600 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Both good for selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A6600 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 503 grams (1.11 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A6600 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II and the A6600.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A6600 is 68 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing technical specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A6600.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6600 will provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography details
Sony A6600 Portrait photography details
75
you can focus manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
82
you can focus manually
good resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Sony A6600 as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
supports focus by touch
environment proofing
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
84
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
offers touch to focus
environment proof
above average high ISO (32,000)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony A6600 as a Sports photography camera
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
terrible battery pack (350 per charge)
85
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
better than average battery (810 shots)
sensor has phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
Sony A6600 Travel photography features
72
lighter than competitors in class (574g)
environment proofing
supports focus by touch
MP count good (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (350 shots)
84
better than average battery (810 CIPA)
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
offers touch to focus
good resolution (24MP)
screen is selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography information
Sony A6600 Landscape photography information
76
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proofing
has dual storage slots
terrible battery pack (350 shots)
85
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (32,000)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
better than average battery (810 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Sony A6600
79
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external microphone jack
lighter than competitors in class (574g)
84
screen is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6600
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Alpha a6600
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Alpha a6600
Class Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2016-09-19 2019-08-28
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 25600 32000
Highest boosted ISO - 102400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 425
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 107 121
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.71x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps 11.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 503g (1.11 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 120 x 67 x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 82
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 23.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 13.4
DXO Low light rating 1312 1497
Other
Battery life 350 photos 810 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-FZ1000
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Two Single
Retail price $1,700 $1,198