Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
77 Imaging
70 Features
96 Overall
80
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 503g - 120 x 67 x 69mm
- Introduced August 2019
- New Model is Sony A6700
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A6600, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the A6600 (24MP) is very comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A6600 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was unveiled 3 years prior to the A6600 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6600 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the A6600 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha a6600. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A6600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A6600
E-M1 II | A6600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 922k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6600 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A6600 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2019 | September 2016 | Newer by 35 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A6600
E-M1 II | A6600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony A6600 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 503 grams (1.11 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A6600 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II and the A6600.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A6600 is 68 and 77 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing technical specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and A6600.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6600 will provide more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A6600 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha a6600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha a6600 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2019-08-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 503g (1.11 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 120 x 67 x 69mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 1497 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 810 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FZ1000 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Retail price | $1,700 | $1,198 |