Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ff55/6ff550c477638a6fe812d244fc23c627cd51c28f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the H200 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H200 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was launched 3 years later than the H200 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M1 II scores vs the H200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H200
E-M1 II | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 45 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus E-M1 II
H200 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H200
E-M1 II | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II versus the H200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2786/e2786dda6af6f96c8c7750ee7624cd4e6bd2648f" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and H200 is 68 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92531/92531ce62cef748d764f92affec67f37a1bcee7c" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and H200.
Plainly, both the cameras have got the exact same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-M1 II has the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/099f3/099f372cef020f74349c0da1c7febd83560b63ac" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9872/f987251c29d24b3316405d8775737ec843f944c5" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 2920 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 20cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 530 grams (1.17 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 240 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $250 |