Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
37
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony H300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-875mm (F3-5.9) lens
  • 590g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
  • Announced February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 Overview

Here is a extended review of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the H300 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H300 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was introduced 2 years later than the H300 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II scores vs the H300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H300

 E-M1 II H300 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016February 2014Fresher by 32 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony H300 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 H300 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H300

 E-M1 II H300 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony H300 has dimensions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") along with a weight of 590 grams (1.30 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II vs the H300.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and H300 is 68 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and H300.

All in all, both cameras posses the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-M1 II has the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler. The more modern E-M1 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography details
Sony H300 Portrait photography details
75
manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
40
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Sony H300 Street photography info
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
has focus via touch
environment sealing
lighter than others (574g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
43
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (590 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Sony H300 Sports photography information
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
has phase detect autofocus
terrible battery power (350 per charge)
50
great zoom range (25-875mm 35.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20MP)
provides tracking focus
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
slow fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography information
Sony H300 Travel photography information
72
lighter than others (574g)
environment sealing
has focus via touch
good MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery power (350 CIPA)
56
great battery pack (350 per charge)
megapixel count good (20MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long reach (875mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (590 grams)
does not have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Sony H300
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment sealing
has double storage slots
terrible battery power (350 shots)
47
fairly wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
great battery pack (350 CIPA)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Sony H300 Vlogging highlights
79
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has mic port
lighter than others (574 grams)
24
fairly wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (590g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H300
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H300
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2016-09-19 2014-02-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Bionz(R)
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 5152 x 3864
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-875mm (35.0x)
Max aperture - f/3-5.9
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 201k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1500s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 8.80 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30p)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 590 grams (1.30 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 350 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Dual One
Pricing at release $1,700 $249