Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400
Portability
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Portability
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony H400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the H400 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H400 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-M1 II was brought out 2 years later than the H400 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores versus the H400 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H400
| E-M1 II | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 32 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| H400 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H400
| E-M1 II | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony H400 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the H400.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and H400 is 68 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and H400.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-M1 II features the bigger sensor which will make getting bokeh easier. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography information
Sony H400 Portrait photography information
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
megapixel count decent (20MP)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Sony H400 Street photography info
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has touch to focus
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
good high ISO (25,600)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Sony H400 Sports photography advice
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
not so great battery life (350 per charge)
excellent zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony H400
lighter than competition in class (574g)
environment sealing
has touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery life (350 CIPA)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (1550mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Sony H400 Landscape photography factors
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery life (350 shots)
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Sony H400 as a Vlogging camera
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
good video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has external mic jack
lighter than competition in class (574g)
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
does have external microphone socket
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
more heavy than competitors (628g)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2014-02-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 201 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.80 m |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 628g (1.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 300 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Two | Single |
| Launch cost | $1,700 | $268 |
