Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 front
Portability
62
Imaging
45
Features
41
Overall
43

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony H400
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the H400 (20MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H400 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 II was brought out 2 years later than the H400 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 II scores versus the H400 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H400

 E-M1 II H400 
RevealedSeptember 2016February 2014Fresher by 32 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kCrisper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 H400 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H400

 E-M1 II H400 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony H400 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") having a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the H400.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and H400 is 68 and 62 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and H400.

As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-M1 II features the bigger sensor which will make getting bokeh easier. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography information
Sony H400 Portrait photography information
75
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
40
megapixel count decent (20MP)
comes with face detection focusing
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Sony H400 Street photography info
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has touch to focus
environment sealing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
good high ISO (25,600)
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Sony H400 Sports photography advice
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
not so great battery life (350 per charge)
51
excellent zoom range (25-1550mm 62.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony H400
72
lighter than competition in class (574g)
environment sealing
has touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery life (350 CIPA)
53
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (1550mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (628 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Sony H400 Landscape photography factors
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery life (350 shots)
44
rather wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Sony H400 as a Vlogging camera
79
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
good video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has external mic jack
lighter than competition in class (574g)
26
rather wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
does have external microphone socket
slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
more heavy than competitors (628g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H400
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-H400
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-09-19 2014-02-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Bionz(R)
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 5152 x 3864
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-1550mm (62.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.4-6.5
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 201 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 8.80 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 X 720
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lbs) 628g (1.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 300 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Two Single
Launch cost $1,700 $268