Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8d31/e8d315a1c42fc97ab7f34fb3dfd3dd8ecf9d8ac5" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front"
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H50, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and H50 (9MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and H50 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 II was brought out 7 years after the H50 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H50 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II grades against the H50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony H50
E-M1 II | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 94 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Olympus E-M1 II
H50 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H50
E-M1 II | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony H50 has specifications of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") with a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony H50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the H50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c116e/c116ed4f0e295f45282ad0d7cbaaa00dc50415e2" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and H50 is 68 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78e81/78e819c0a549fd732f3f6a0ce881d35fcce51bb9" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and H50.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will render extra detail having its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0eb15/0eb156056fd076b8655dfa6232cbd6d24f4ea5ad" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75894/75894b3fdcab12cefe760df4dff7fb83015d69e9" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony H50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 9.10 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 547 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Launch price | $1,700 | $80 |