Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
90 Imaging
42 Features
50 Overall
45
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 254g - 107 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched July 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX10V
- Renewed by Sony HX30V
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the HX20V (18MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HX20V (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 4 years later than the HX20V and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX20V being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M1 II grades versus the HX20V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony HX20V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony HX20V
E-M1 II | HX20V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | July 2012 | More recent by 51 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 922k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX20V over the Olympus E-M1 II
HX20V | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX20V
E-M1 II | HX20V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony HX20V has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 254 grams (0.56 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II and the HX20V.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and HX20V is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and HX20V.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX20V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2016-09-19 | 2012-07-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.10 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 254g (0.56 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 107 x 62 x 35mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 320 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $397 |