Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350
Portability
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Portability
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony HX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Launched December 2016
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the HX350 (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HX350 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M1 II was launched 3 months earlier than the HX350 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M1 II scores versus the HX350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony HX350
| E-M1 II | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 922k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| HX350 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX350
| E-M1 II | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2016 |  | December 2016 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony HX350 has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the HX350.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and HX350 is 68 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and HX350.
All in all, both the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II provides the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field easier.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Sony HX350
you can focus manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Sony HX350 Street photography factors
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
includes focus via touch
weather proof
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than others (652g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography details
Sony HX350 Sports photography details
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
has phase detect autofocus
bad battery life (350 shots)
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX350 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
weather proof
includes focus via touch
MP count good (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery life (350 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (652 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Sony HX350 Landscape photography highlights
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
has double storage slots
bad battery life (350 shots)
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Sony HX350 Vlogging details
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
has external microphone port
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
heavier than others (652g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2016-12-20 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 202k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 652 gr (1.44 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | 2 | One |
| Price at release | $1,700 | - |
