Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V front
Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
46
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony HX9V
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
  • Revealed July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V Overview

Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX9V, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and HX9V (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and HX9V (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was introduced 5 years later than the HX9V and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX9V being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II grades versus the HX9V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony HX9V

 E-M1 II HX9V 
RevealedSeptember 2016July 2011Fresher by 63 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k921kCrisper display (+116k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus E-M1 II

 HX9V E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX9V

 E-M1 II HX9V 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony HX9V has specifications of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX9V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II and the HX9V.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and HX9V is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and HX9V.

As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Sony HX9V
75
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
exports RAW files
39
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Sony HX9V as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
boasts touch to focus
environment sealing
lighter than average in class (574g)
good ISO range (25,600)
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography information
Sony HX9V Sports photography information
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery power (350 shots)
44
great zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography advice
Sony HX9V Travel photography advice
72
lighter than average in class (574g)
environment sealing
boasts touch to focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
69
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (384mm)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Sony HX9V Landscape photography factors
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery power (350 shots)
49
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging features
Sony HX9V Vlogging features
79
screen is selfie friendly
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes microphone jack
lighter than average in class (574g)
33
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony HX9V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony HX9V
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2016-09-19 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-384mm (16.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 245g (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BG1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Dual Single
Retail pricing $1,700 $328