Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2013
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the QX10 (18MP) is relatively similar but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and QX10 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 3 years after the QX10 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M1 II scores against the QX10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony QX10
E-M1 II | QX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | September 2013 | More modern by 38 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 0k | Crisper screen (+1037k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus E-M1 II
QX10 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony QX10
E-M1 II | QX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony QX10 has dimensions of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II against the QX10.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and QX10 is 68 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The picture underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and QX10.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Lens-style |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2013-09-04 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | None |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) | 105 grams (0.23 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 220 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $1,700 | $250 |