Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100
Portability
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Portability
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony QX100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Launched September 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Lens-style by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the QX100 (20MP) is pretty close but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and QX100 (1") boast different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1 II was launched 3 years after the QX100 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores against the QX100 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony QX100
| E-M1 II | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2016 |  | September 2013 | Newer by 37 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | " | Bigger screen (+3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 0k | Clearer screen (+1037k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| QX100 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony QX100
| E-M1 II | QX100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has sizing of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II and the QX100.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and QX100 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and QX100.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II uses the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The younger E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Sony QX100
focusing manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW files
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
offers face detection autofocus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Sony QX100
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
comes with focus via touch
no articulating screen
does not have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony QX100 as a Sports photography camera
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
bad battery (350 CIPA)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
low battery life (200 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography highlights
Sony QX100 Travel photography highlights
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
weather sealing
boasts touch focus
MP count good (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
bad battery (350 CIPA)
comes with focus via touch
MP count good (20 megapixels)
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse mode
low battery life (200 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Sony QX100 Landscape photography details
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
has double storage slots
bad battery (350 CIPA)
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
screen is somewhat small ( inch)
no manual control
does not have RAW format
low battery life (200 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Sony QX100
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic port
lighter than others in class (574 grams)
quite wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony QX100 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2013-09-05 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 160 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | - |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | None |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 200 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BN, |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | 2 | Single |
| Pricing at release | $1,700 | $268 |