Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a1f/04a1f3ad992de867dcbb3b964aee0d2661adec42" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 front"
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Revealed February 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony RX1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the RX1 (24MP) is very comparable but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and RX1 (Full frame) feature totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 II was released 3 years later than the RX1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M1 II scores versus the RX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony RX1
E-M1 II | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2013 | More recent by 44 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
RX1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer display (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony RX1
E-M1 II | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony RX1 has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony RX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II versus the RX1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af079/af079eaeb19fa3bac6e275e4da45b46fa8a0b5cb" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and RX1 is 68 and 79 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e19c1/e19c17706c46181bf00c2b9d7ede8048103a8285" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specs. The graphic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and RX1.
All in all, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sony RX1 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4af8/a4af800b8f2c4e1ec3975ed8af329553d58c4bc0" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92b4c/92b4c9f552fd378ca0d80f9f9a68159696dc8e46" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2013-02-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-22.0 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 482g (1.06 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 270 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Price at release | $1,700 | $2,798 |