Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
26
Overall
30

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony T90
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony T90, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and T90 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and T90 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 II was introduced 7 years after the T90 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T90 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II scores against the T90 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony T90

 E-M1 II T90 
IntroducedSeptember 2016February 2009Newer by 93 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kCrisper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 T90 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony T90

 E-M1 II T90 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II provides outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony T90 has proportions of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony T90 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II against the T90.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and T90 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The image here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and T90.

As you can see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver more detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography details
Sony T90 Portrait photography details
75
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW files
27
focusing manually
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography info
Sony T90 Street photography info
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts touch focus
environment proofing
lighter than competition (574 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (148g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography info
Sony T90 Sports photography info
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
terrible battery (350 shots)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max fps very slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony T90
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
environment proofing
boasts touch focus
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
terrible battery (350 shots)
50
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors in class (148g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T90 as a Landscape photography camera
76
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
two card slots
terrible battery (350 CIPA)
36
focusing manually
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Sony T90
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focus
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic socket
lighter than competition (574 grams)
27
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external mic support
heavier than competitors in class (148g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T90 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony T90
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
Category Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2009-02-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter rate 60.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 148g (0.33 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots Two One
Pricing at release $1,700 $259