Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
27
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
  • New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony T99
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
  • Released July 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 Overview

Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony T99, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and T99 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and T99 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 II was brought out 6 years later than the T99 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up against the T99 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony T99

 E-M1 II T99 
ReleasedSeptember 2016July 2010More recent by 76 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 T99 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony T99

 E-M1 II T99 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony T99 has dimensions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony T99 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the T99.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and T99 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and T99.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Sony T99 Portrait photography highlights
76
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW files
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Sony T99 Street photography factors
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
features focus by touch
weather proof
lighter than competition (574g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Sony T99
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
weather proof
supports phase detect auto focus
terrible battery life (350 per charge)
35
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony T99
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather proof
features focus by touch
megapixel count good (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery life (350 CIPA)
65
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (25mm)
missing Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Sony T99
76
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
has double storage slots
terrible battery life (350 shots)
42
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Sony T99 Vlogging factors
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with microphone port
lighter than competition (574g)
31
rather wide (25mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony T99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony T99
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99
Type Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2016-09-19 2010-07-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-4.6
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1250 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.60 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lbs) 121g (0.27 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Two Single
Price at launch $1,700 $179