Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony TX100V
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V Overview

Here is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony TX100V, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TX100V (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TX100V (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was brought out 5 years later than the TX100V and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-M1 II matches up against the TX100V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony TX100V

 E-M1 II TX100V 
RevealedSeptember 2016January 2011Fresher by 70 months
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Olympus E-M1 II

 TX100V E-M1 II 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1229k1037kClearer screen (+192k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX100V

 E-M1 II TX100V 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony TX100V has dimensions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony TX100V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the TX100V.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and TX100V is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and TX100V.

Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II should have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
Sony TX100V Portrait photography advice
75
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
30
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Sony TX100V as a Street photography camera
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
supports touch to focus
weather proofing
lighter than competitors in class (574g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
60
image stabilization (Optical)
features touch focus
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Sony TX100V Sports photography advice
74
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
supports phase detect AF
bad battery life (350 per charge)
39
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography features
Sony TX100V Travel photography features
72
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
weather proofing
supports touch to focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
65
features touch focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Landscape photography camera
Sony TX100V as a Landscape photography camera
76
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
two card slots
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
43
pretty wide (25mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
Sony TX100V Vlogging info
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with microphone socket
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
32
pretty wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (147 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX100V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX100V
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V
Category Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2016-09-19 2011-01-06
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-4.6
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 147 grams (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 2 1
Pricing at launch $1,700 $380