Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


96 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced February 2012

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TX20 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TX20 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

The E-M1 II was announced 4 years later than the TX20 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX20 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II grades vs the TX20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony TX20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony TX20
E-M1 II | TX20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 56 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX20 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TX20 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX20
E-M1 II | TX20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony TX20 has specifications of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-M1 II and the TX20.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TX20 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and TX20.
As you can tell, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II provides an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX20 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 pounds) | 133g (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 250 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $330 |