Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Revealed July 2011
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX55, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TX55 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TX55 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was announced 5 years later than the TX55 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the TX55 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony TX55
E-M1 II | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | July 2011 | Fresher by 63 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Olympus E-M1 II
TX55 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 1037k | Clearer display (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX55
E-M1 II | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has sizing of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") and a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX55 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the TX55.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TX55 is 68 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and TX55.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2011-07-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 109g (0.24 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 250 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $350 |