Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
46
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony TX55
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
  • Revealed July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Overview

Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX55, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TX55 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TX55 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was announced 5 years later than the TX55 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the TX55 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony TX55

 E-M1 II TX55 
RevealedSeptember 2016July 2011Fresher by 63 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 TX55 E-M1 II 
Display dimension3.3"3"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k1037kClearer display (+193k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX55

 E-M1 II TX55 
Focus manually More exact focus
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has sizing of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") and a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX55 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the TX55.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TX55 is 68 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The graphic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and TX55.

As you have seen, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography features
Sony TX55 Portrait photography features
76
focusing manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
36
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Sony TX55 Street photography highlights
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
supports touch to focus
environment proof
lighter than average (574 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
58
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Sony TX55
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
low battery power (350 shots)
44
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
good battery power (250 shots)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Sony TX55 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than average (574g)
environment proof
supports touch to focus
good resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
low battery power (350 shots)
69
good battery power (250 per charge)
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Sony TX55 Landscape photography factors
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
has double storage slots
low battery power (350 shots)
50
focusing manually
fairly wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3.3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good battery power (250 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Sony TX55
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external mic port
lighter than average (574g)
34
fairly wide (26mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX55 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX55
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55
Category Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2016-09-19 2011-07-24
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focus range - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3.3"
Display resolution 1,037k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - XtraFine OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 109g (0.24 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photos 250 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots Two Single
Retail cost $1,700 $350