Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony W220, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and W220 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and W220 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was unveiled 7 years after the W220 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M1 II grades versus the W220 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony W220

 E-M1 II W220 
ReleasedSeptember 2016January 2009Newer by 94 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 W220 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W220

 E-M1 II W220 
Manually focus Dial precise focus

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony W220 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the W220.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and W220 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and W220.

Clearly, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Sony W220 Portrait photography factors
76
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
27
you can focus manually
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Sony W220
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
comes with focus via touch
weather sealing
lighter than average (574g)
very good high ISO (25,600)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Sony W220 Sports photography advice
75
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
max fps high (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
low battery life (350 per charge)
25
image stabilization (Optical)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony W220
72
lighter than average (574 grams)
weather sealing
comes with focus via touch
megapixel count decent (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
low battery life (350 per charge)
51
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Sony W220
76
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
has double storage slots
low battery life (350 per charge)
32
you can focus manually
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
low resolution (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Sony W220
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have external mic port
lighter than average (574g)
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (30mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W220
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2016-09-19 2009-01-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 30-120mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-7.1
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video data format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 147 grams (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Dual Single
Cost at release $1,700 $160