Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony W310
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and W310 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and W310 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M1 II was revealed 6 years after the W310 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the W310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony W310

 E-M1 II W310 
IntroducedSeptember 2016January 2010Newer by 82 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 W310 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W310

 E-M1 II W310 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony W310 has specifications of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II and the W310.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and W310 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The picture underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and W310.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will result in greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Sony W310 Portrait photography factors
75
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
saves RAW formats
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Sony W310 as a Street photography camera
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
weather proofing
lighter than competitors (574g)
good ISO range (25,600)
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Sony W310 Sports photography highlights
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
not so great battery (350 per charge)
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography advice
Sony W310 Travel photography advice
72
lighter than competitors (574g)
weather proofing
boasts focus by touch
decent megapixels (20MP)
selfie friendly display
not so great battery (350 per charge)
58
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography advice
Sony W310 Landscape photography advice
76
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery (350 CIPA)
32
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
Sony W310 as a Vlogging camera
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone jack
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
29
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W310
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2010-01-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.8
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 640x480
Video file format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 137 grams (0.30 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 2 Single
Cost at launch $1,700 $150