Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony W350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 Overview

In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W350, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and W350 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and W350 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was introduced 6 years later than the W350 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M1 II scores vs the W350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony W350

 E-M1 II W350 
LaunchedSeptember 2016January 2010More recent by 82 months
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 W350 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W350

 E-M1 II W350 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II has got outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony W350 has specifications of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the W350.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and W350 is 68 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and W350.

As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography features
Sony W350 Portrait photography features
75
you can focus manually
MP count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
28
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Sony W350
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts touch focus
weather proof
lighter than competition (574 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
58
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography factors
Sony W350 Sports photography factors
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect autofocus
low battery (350 per charge)
34
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
slow fps (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony W350
72
lighter than competition (574g)
weather proof
boasts touch focus
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
low battery (350 CIPA)
66
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Sony W350
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proof
has double storage slots
low battery (350 per charge)
37
reasonably wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging advice
Sony W350 Vlogging advice
79
screen is selfie friendly
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic port
lighter than competition (574g)
29
reasonably wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W350
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2010-01-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.80 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 117 grams (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots Two 1
Pricing at release $1,700 $200