Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1
  • Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony W380
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
  • 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 Overview

Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and W380 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and W380 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 II was announced 6 years after the W380 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the W380 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony W380

 E-M1 II W380 
LaunchedSeptember 2016January 2010More modern by 82 months
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 W380 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W380

 E-M1 II W380 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II offers physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony W380 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the W380.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and W380 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and W380.

All in all, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography factors
Sony W380 Portrait photography factors
75
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
28
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Sony W380
78
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
provides touch to focus
weather sealing
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Sony W380 Sports photography highlights
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
not so great battery life (350 CIPA)
34
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Sony W380 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
weather sealing
provides touch to focus
resolution is good (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery life (350 per charge)
65
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Sony W380
76
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
has dual storage slots
not so great battery life (350 shots)
37
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Sony W380 Vlogging details
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have mic jack
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
29
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W380 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W380
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W380
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380
Type Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2016-09-19 2010-01-07
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.4-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 117 grams (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 2 1
Launch pricing $1,700 $44