Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
25
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony W570
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 116g - 91 x 52 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 Overview

Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and W570 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and W570 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 II was released 5 years later than the W570 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W570 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M1 II scores against the W570 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony W570

 E-M1 II W570 
LaunchedSeptember 2016January 2011More recent by 70 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kSharper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W570 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 W570 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W570

 E-M1 II W570 

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony W570 has proportions of 91mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the W570.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and W570 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and W570.

To sum up, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W570 as a Portrait photography camera
75
you can focus manually
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
30
megapixel count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography information
Sony W570 Street photography information
78
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment sealing
lighter than competitors (574g)
above average ISO range (25,600)
58
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography advice
Sony W570 Sports photography advice
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
max fps high (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
not so great battery pack (350 per charge)
36
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony W570 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competitors (574g)
environment sealing
comes with focus by touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
66
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Sony W570 Landscape photography details
76
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
two card slots
not so great battery pack (350 CIPA)
38
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Sony W570
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have mic socket
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
29
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W570 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W570
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W570
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2011-01-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.6-6.3
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - Clear Photo LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 116 grams (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 91 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Two One
Retail cost $1,700 $159