Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony W690
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and W690 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and W690 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was brought out 4 years after the W690 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W690 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II grades against the W690 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony W690

 E-M1 II W690 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016February 2012More modern by 56 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 W690 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W690

 E-M1 II W690 
Display size3"3"Same display measurements

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony W690 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II versus the W690.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and W690 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The image here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and W690.

As you can see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will render extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 II should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W690 as a Portrait photography camera
75
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
34
decent megapixels (16MP)
has face detection focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography features
Sony W690 Street photography features
78
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
features touch focus
weather sealing
lighter than competition in class (574g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Sony W690
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
weather sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
bad battery (350 shots)
40
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
max fps low (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography information
Sony W690 Travel photography information
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
weather sealing
features touch focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery (350 CIPA)
68
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (250mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Sony W690 Landscape photography details
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
has double storage slots
bad battery (350 shots)
43
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 II
Vlogging with Sony W690
79
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with mic port
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
31
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony W690 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony W690
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W690
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2012-02-28
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - ClearPhoto TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.30 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lb) 142 grams (0.31 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 220 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Two 1
Launch pricing $1,700 $297