Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150 front
Portability
95
Imaging
42
Features
43
Overall
42

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony WX150
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 133g - 95 x 56 x 22mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 Overview

Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the WX150 (18MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX150 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1 II was introduced 4 years after the WX150 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX150 being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up against the WX150 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX150

 E-M1 II WX150 
IntroducedSeptember 2016February 2012More modern by 56 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k461kClearer screen (+576k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony WX150 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WX150 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX150

 E-M1 II WX150 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony WX150 has dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the WX150.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and WX150 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and WX150.

Clearly, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 II using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
Sony WX150 Portrait photography advice
76
manual focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
38
good MP (18 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
no manual focus
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography highlights
Sony WX150 Street photography highlights
78
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has touch to focus
environment sealing
lighter than others (574 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
64
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (133g)
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Sony WX150 as a Sports photography camera
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
has phase detect AF
not so great battery life (350 CIPA)
46
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (18MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX150 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than others (574 grams)
environment sealing
has touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery life (350 shots)
71
lighter than competition (133g)
good MP (18MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very long reach (250mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
Sony WX150 Landscape photography factors
76
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
two card slots
not so great battery life (350 CIPA)
46
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (18MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging info
Sony WX150 Vlogging info
79
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
has mic socket
lighter than others (574g)
35
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (133 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX150 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX150
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX150
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2016-09-19 2012-02-28
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dots 461k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - ClearPhoto TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1600 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lbs) 133 grams (0.29 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 95 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 240 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Dual One
Price at launch $1,700 $300